For instance, in 2006, Daniella Cicarelli Lemos was the subject of a scandal involving the paparazzi. Paparazzi make the private behavior of such individuals a matter of public notice and present society with an opportunity to make objective judgments (Fareed, 2009). It is possible for such individuals to present an act in public and behave differently away from the public eye. The argument is that if certain people put themselves in the limelight and present themselves as role models to the society’s younger individuals, society has the right to criticize their actions as part of the process of determining whether they deserve to be role models. The paparazzi, in their own way, serve the society’s interest by reporting matters that require key individuals in society to re-evaluate their activities with regard to their overall effect to society. One of the arguments that people have presented over the years in support of the law’s protection of paparazzi activities is that the paparazzi indirectly protect the society’s moral fiber. Additionally, although society benefits from paparazzi activities indirectly, subjects of paparazzi activities divert attention to the methods that paparazzi use, thus making them seem like villains and a nuisance to society even when they are not. However, in most cases, people focus so much on the ‘how’ regarding paparazzi activity and ignore the ‘why’. This aspect means that the law protects that content that the paparazzi gather for publication before they publish the same, regardless of their method of collection. For instance, in the case of the New York Times v United States in 1971, the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects against restraints that prevent distribution of information prior to publication. The law considers paparazzi activities legal as long as they do not infringe on any individual’s rights and freedoms. Although some people often present the argument that paparazzi activities amount to harassment and that their protection by the law goes against basic rights, it is noteworthy that the law protects every person in equal measure. The First Amendment of the American constitution protects the paparazzi individually as American citizens through the protection of their freedom of speech and expression and professionally through the freedom of the press clause. This paper presents an objective analysis of both sides of the argument. Others argue that lack of affiliation with any mainstream media negates the paparazzi’s claim for protection by the constitution. However, some people disagree with this notion by stating that some of paparazzi’s activities infringe on the rights and freedoms of other members of society, and thus warrant no protection by the constitution. This aspect has generated much controversy over the years with paparazzi claiming protection of their activities by the freedom of the press clause of the constitution. (June 4, 2020) a way to differentiate themselves from other freelance photographer, paparazzi focus on both the professional and personal undertakings of important figures in society and pride themselves in taking pictures and videos of such people doing things that most other photographers would not consider taking. They’ve since reveled in typical couple stuff together, like beach photoshoots and mask nuzzling.īen Affleck’s kids decided that one Ana de Armas wasn’t enough so they brought a life-size poster cut-out of her to play with outside as well. (June 5, 2020) /SKmpxq1tDN- Ana de Armas Updates June 5, 2020Īffleck and de Armas have been dating since March, after they met on the set of their upcoming psychological drama Deep Water. However, Affleck’s three children got in on the glamour pose fun, as they were also spotted giggling and helping Armas find a good spot for the cutout on her lawn.Īna de Armas trolls the obsessed paparazzi by placing a cardboard cut-out version of herself in the front yard of her current residence. As alerted to us by the celebrity stan account that has been blocked by the actress herself, Ana de Armas has seemingly commissioned a cardboard cutout of herself to put in front of her Los Angeles home to … troll the paparazzi? For taking all of those photos of Armas and her new boyfriend Ben Affleck drinking iced coffee, walking a dog, and drinking more iced coffee? Or revenge for the fact that we discovered Affleck’s secret and very dad Instagram page? Jury’s still out. Photo: to have a disposable arts and crafts budget while in quarantine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |